Memveri vs the field
Memveri isn't another coding agent. It's the memory, code-intelligence, and safety layer that works on top of the agent you already use. Here's how the pieces compare, fact by fact.
Measured on our own codebase
These are real numbers from Memveri's own benchmark scripts (scripts/benchmark_index.py,
scripts/benchmark_recall.py), run on a laptop. Claude Code, OpenCode, and MiMo Code do not
publish comparable indexing, recall, or latency numbers — so rather than inventing competitor scores,
we show what we actually measured.
Indexing throughput
Full knowledge-graph build, synthetic tree.
Incremental updates
Re-index after one save. No full reparse.
Real repo
Full build 38.7s incl. embeddings + community detection; ~27 graph queries/sec.
Recall accuracy
Vector recall at k=10 across topics; matches brute-force cosine search.
The other tools are excellent agents. None of them give you a persistent, tool-agnostic memory with a guardrail ledger and a code knowledge graph.
Add Memveri on top of the one you already use — and keep it.
Download for WindowsHow we scored this comparison
Feature matrix reflects public documentation as of July 2026. "Partial" means the capability exists in a limited form — e.g. Claude Code's memory is guidance loaded into context, not an enforced, searchable store (per Anthropic's own docs), and MiMo Code's memory is SQLite full-text search, not semantic recall.